« Retail Consolidation | Main | Happy 50th Anniversary Mom and Dad »

Thursday, April 22, 2004

Marketing After Crossing The Chasm

Okay, this is one of those posts where I have to remind everyone that this is MY PERSONAL OPINION, and I don't speak for Microsoft officially here. I don't work in the Windows group. I'm not all that technical. And of course I make no warrantees, expressed or implied (whatever that means).

One of my favorite bloggers, Halley Suitt, just posted a rant on Halley's Comment called "Upgrade = Downgrade Per Usual." She outlines her frustration with upgrading her Windows system, and it really struck a chord with me. She writes:

"I decided to risk it. I ran the upgrade thing and it told me there were 6 applications that needed updates. It also told me some COMPLETELY INDECIPHERABLE TECHNICAL-MARKETING-BLAH-BLAH thing about needing the "Exclusive Service Package" and of course that this must be done first.

I had no idea (NOR WANTED TO KNOW) what the hell their Exclusive Service Package (or whatever the obscure language was) did or why I needed it. Also the word "exclusive" was confusing to me -- what's exclusive about it -- do I have to pay for it? Is it exclusive to only certain customers? What the hell is "exclusive service" -- an 800 number with a non-Bangalorean person on the other end?

It also had that anti-customer tone of "you know you have to do this before you do that, of course" except I had no idea WHAT applications were being upgraded (there was a spagetti pile of words I couldn't make heads nor tails of) and why I might have to do one first or not. Shouldn't the software guys who are so keen on these being done in some order, SIMPLY DO THEM IN ORDER, ALL ON THEIR OWN. Why are they asking me to do that? Oh, yeah, I forgot, because I'm a PhD in Computer Science with nothing to do for the next 5 hours -- NOT!!!!!"

The ironic thing is, the whole "Windows Update" thing is supposed to make it easier to keep things updated, not harder.

I'm hopeful that future versions of Windows (including the periodic Service Packs like SP2) will make the whole user experience more intuitive, for both advanced and beginning users. The newest SP2 (now in beta) does make some progress in making Windows Update easier--though there's always room for improvement when it comes to making things elegant.

Something I've found interesting (culturally speaking) about marketing is that I'm finding some people in this industry struggling with the fact that we're marketing to a different audience now. When a lot of our most senior marketers were hired, Operating Systems (and PC's) were sold to early adopters, technically-savvy "end users", systems admins, corporate IT groups, people who wanted us to talk in bits and bytes and speeds and feeds. Now that 80% of households have PCs, and nearly everyone has a PC on their desk at work, our customers are very, very different than they were just a few years ago.

From Geoffrey Moore's "Crossing the Chasm" model, PC's (and operating systems and applications) have moved past the top of the adoption curve, and even to the tail, where a significant (thank goodness not a majority) of users are pragmatics and reluctants. They want to see things work in a very different way than early adopters, even the early majority. (I joke with Halley and put her at the end of the tail--she writes about it in Worthwhile).

chasm.jpg

Music is a great example for me. Don't make me fill out preferences and click boxes and save files and choose bit rates. I want a freaking jukebox that plays a CD when I pop it in.

Media Player 9 is very, very cool. And a lot better than version 8. If you haven't downloaded it, I highly recommend it. It should do what Halley was asking. But how can we make the whole experience better for those who aren't enthusiasts or geeks? In case you haven't noticed, Windows XP is a whole lot easier to use than Windows 95 is. And I hope Longhorn will take us even further.

In the meantime, I want to say THANKS for the rant. I hope it furthers the cause of those of us reminding people to remember we have a lot of different customers, not just geeks.

FWIW, I don't know what COMPLETELY INDECIPHERABLE TECHNICAL-MARKETING-BLAH-BLAH means most of the time either.

Oh, ya. When you get stuck, ask your kids. Chances are, they'll know what to do...

Posted at 04:30 PM in Computers, Computing, Software | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834201f2253ef00e5506a3e1d8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Marketing After Crossing The Chasm:

» Keep It Simple Stupid by Halley Suitt in Technology from shawn's blog
[Read More]

Tracked on Apr 23, 2004 10:50:41 AM

» Keep It Simple Stupid by Halley Suitt in Technology from shawn's blog
[Read More]

Tracked on Apr 23, 2004 10:54:14 AM

Comments

I think it comes down to the fact that there isn't just one type of user anymore (as depicted above in your graph). Years ago it was easy…just keep dumping new features in that were better / faster than the previous version and the end users would figure it out because they were enthusiasts / early adopters.

Today there are all kinds of users that all have different needs and preferences. Heck that has been what has made Microsoft so great in my books - they bought the computer to where it should be…people's homes and just about every business. Windows XP is amazing. It has something for everyone…but the problem is that not EVERYONE knows where to find what they want. I see it all the time.

Operating Systems (all software really I guess) have to become more aware of who the user is. For example if a user sits down to a computer for the first time and has poor eyesight…chances are they will never ever find out how to increase their font and icon size. They become frustrated with "computers" because of one small feature that they could easily change…but just don't know how.

But on the same note, making any drastic changes to the interface or layout of things may affect the familiarity element for many users and thereby impair their ability to perform the tasks they are most familiar with.

Why can't there be a utility or toolbar (that advanced users can disable once they have seen it and categorized it as lame) that allows new users to complete a wizard or form by answering a few questions which identifies their experience level, visual preferences, usage requirements etc… Not asking them to pick which features they want installed. They probably don't know. But ask them things they CAN answer because it relates specifically to them and how they want to use it (email, pictures, games, word processing, video conferencing, music), . Based on their choices their profile should be adjusted to suit their preferences. Heck even if there were 3-4 different configurations available…it might be more effective than just one.

Software updates is a tricky one. In most cases, the more automatic the better when it comes to critical updates and hotfixes. The average user shouldn't have to answer too many questions or make too many decisions on whether or not they should install something. Whenever I think of users making decisions, I think of Joel Spolsky's book on user interface design. A mandatory read for anyone making decisions on software or interface design.

Ok too much typing for a comment. :-P

Posted by: Amanda Murphy at Apr 22, 2004 7:10:51 PM

interesting view.
sounds like something you'd copy off that really smart guy that
works for you..

Posted by: Danny at Apr 22, 2004 10:53:17 PM

nice to know that really smart guy that works for me actually visits this site every now and then! Now quit surfing the web and get back to work!

Posted by: John Porcaro at Apr 23, 2004 7:23:09 AM

Very interesting thread. John, you continue to impress me with your posts. Thanks for sharing with the rest of us.

I think this dilemma begs, among many others, the question, "To wizard or not to wizard." Stretch it past the Operating System and into the professional development tools world. When you have a very mature development tool with a very loyal following of emotionally and professionally invested customers you reach a point where you need to seriously examine satisfying existing users while increasing market share by attracting new customers.

The wizard mentioned seems to be a workable approach, but wizards rarely do everything that everyone wants them to do. The alternative approach is creating new or customized versions of applications that are specifically intended for distinct customer types. Of course, then you often forfeit the brand-name mindshare advantage. It's a tough call...

I'm a big fan of solving these problems by strengthening customer awareness and training programs. I think there are still big opportunities for in-product solutions for getting new users up to speed and successful more quickly. In my experience, users that are new to software applications are best served if they can be successful in small increments. The success to time ratio seriously effects interest levels.

Anyways, great topic. Thanks for bringing it up.

Posted by: Mike Downey at Apr 25, 2004 10:05:29 PM

would be so much easier to understand why kids are able to understand it better than the adults.

now if we understood how kids interpret techie info, then it's a marketing goldmine.

Posted by: Wena at Apr 26, 2004 10:09:12 PM